The employee to remove the defect.
District Court in Gliwice indicated that in order to prove that the plaintiff's work was defective, the defendant should prove that the plaintiff had committed specific violations regarding design principles, in such a way that any errors made by the plaintiff can be verified - first by an employee - and in the event of filing a lawsuit, by the Court cf. Judgment of the District Court in Gliwice of Octobe act VIII Pa . IMPORTANT - if the employer has paid remuneration and the product or.Service turns out to be defective due to the employee's fault, undue amounts may be deducted from the remuneration only with the prior consent of the employee. If a product or service is defectively manufactured, it is phone number list worth remembering that the employer is not obliged to allowOnly at the request of the employer, the employee is obliged to remove the defect, for which he is not entitled to additional remuneration, and what is more, the removal of the consequences of faulty work is not part of the employee's working time. Are you wondering how much the minimum wage is in If so, go here.
https://static.wixstatic.com/media/fe6211_2d51b576c1c84a40b0091b3822b0d6c5~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_656,h_376,al_c,lg_1,q_80,enc_auto/fe6211_2d51b576c1c84a40b0091b3822b0d6c5~mv2.jpg
Case law Judgment of the District Court of Labor and Social Insurance in Łódź of February , , ref. no. IP file Article of the Labor Code allows the workplace not to pay remuneration to an employee for poor quality work, and if only part of the work is affected by defects or faults - for that part. However, the condition for the workplace to exercise this right is the production of poor quality products or services due to the employee's fault. Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Katowice of Februa III APa Poor quality of products manufactured by the brigade cannot be equated with the employee's liability under Art.
頁:
[1]